Stop Dropping Candidates and Hiring Manager Follow-Ups

Claryti is an AI-powered daily brief built for recruiters who manage 25 or more open roles across multiple hiring managers and candidate pipelines. It reads your email, Slack, meetings, and calendar, then tells you exactly which candidates need follow-ups, which hiring managers are waiting on responses, and what deadlines are approaching, all delivered at 8 AM. Starting at $15/mo with a free 7-day trial.

Why do recruiters lose track of candidates and commitments?

Recruiting is a high-volume coordination role. On any given day, a recruiter managing 25 open roles might conduct four candidate screens, send follow-up emails to six candidates, coordinate interview schedules with three hiring managers, process two offer approvals, and handle incoming candidate questions across email and Slack. Every one of these interactions generates commitments: you promise to send interview details, a hiring manager commits to providing feedback by end of day, a candidate says they will send references by Friday.

These commitments are scattered across email inboxes, Slack channels, meeting conversations, and calendar events. According to research on meeting follow-ups, 39% of commitments are never completed. In recruiting, a missed follow-up does not just mean a delayed task. It means a top candidate takes another offer because you were slow to respond, or a hiring manager loses confidence in the process because you forgot to send their feedback request.

The cost of context switching between roles and candidates makes the problem worse. Each candidate has their own stage, history, and set of stakeholders. Each hiring manager has their own communication style and expectations. Switching between these contexts dozens of times per day leads to the kind of working memory overload where commitments slip through the cracks.

How does Claryti solve this for recruiters?

Claryti connects to your email, Slack, calendar, and meeting tools using read-only access, then processes all your recruiting communications overnight. By 8 AM, you receive a single daily brief with four prioritized sections covering every open role, candidate, and hiring manager relationship.

Why do recruiters choose Claryti over ATS tools alone?

Applicant tracking systems are built to manage pipeline stages, not the daily commitments that move candidates through those stages. Your ATS knows that a candidate is in the "Final Round" stage. It does not know that you promised to send them interview prep materials yesterday and have not done it yet. It does not know that the hiring manager committed to providing feedback by Wednesday and has gone silent. It does not know that a passive candidate you have been nurturing has not heard from you in two weeks.

Claryti's bi-directional commitment tracking captures the promises that happen in meetings, email, and Slack, then surfaces them when they are due or overdue. You see what you owe candidates and hiring managers, and what they owe you. When a hiring manager says "I will give you feedback by end of day" in a Slack message and does not follow through, that appears in your next morning's brief.

The meeting prep feature helps you walk into every hiring sync and candidate conversation with full context. Before your weekly sync with a hiring manager, your brief shows open roles, pending feedback, candidate status, and recent communications. Before a candidate interview, it surfaces notes from previous conversations and any commitments made. Compare this to transcription-only tools that record interviews but do not track the follow-ups that keep candidates engaged.

What features matter most for recruiting workflows?